---

Quick Definition

Descriptive statistics summarizes and describes the main features of a dataset using concise measures and visualizations.
Analogy: Descriptive statistics is the dashboard summary you read in the morning that shows mileage, fuel level, and average speed before a drive.
Formal: Descriptive statistics uses measures of central tendency, dispersion, and shape to summarize observed data without making inferential claims about a population.

---

What is descriptive statistics?

Descriptive statistics is the branch of statistics focused on summarizing observed data. It is about reporting what the data shows, not inferring beyond the data. It includes measures like mean, median, mode, variance, percentiles, and charts like histograms and box plots.

What it is NOT

• Not inferential: it does not test hypotheses about populations beyond collected samples.
• Not predictive by itself: it does not build models to forecast future values.
• Not a replacement for causal analysis: it cannot establish causality.

Key properties and constraints

• Data-dependent: results describe only the dataset analyzed.
• Sensitive to outliers: some measures (mean, standard deviation) can be skewed by extreme values.
• Aggregation choices matter: bin sizes, time windows, and grouping change interpretation.
• Requires data quality: missing or duplicated records change summaries.

Where it fits in modern cloud/SRE workflows

• Observability: summarizes telemetry to give SREs immediate operational context.
• Incident Triage: provides quick statistics on latency, error rates, and traffic.
• Capacity planning: aggregates resource usage over time for autoscaling decisions.
• Security telemetry: summarizes suspicious event counts for analysts.
• Data pipelines: used in data quality checks and schema drift detection.

Diagram description (text-only)

• Imagine a funnel: raw telemetry flows in at the top; streaming collectors and batch jobs normalize and enrich; descriptive stats engines compute windows and aggregates; dashboards, alerts, and reports read those aggregates; engineers take action or feed aggregates into models.

descriptive statistics in one sentence

Descriptive statistics summarizes observed data with compact numerical and visual summaries to inform decisions and detect anomalies.

descriptive statistics vs related terms (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Term	How it differs from descriptive statistics	Common confusion
T1	Inferential statistics	Makes population-level inferences and tests hypotheses	People confuse summary with causation
T2	Predictive analytics	Builds models to forecast future values	Both use data but different goals
T3	Exploratory data analysis	More iterative and hypothesis-generating	EDA includes visuals and tests beyond summary
T4	Causal inference	Aims to identify cause and effect	Users expect causality from correlation
T5	Machine learning	Optimizes predictive performance	ML may use descriptive features but is not summary-focused
T6	Data engineering	Builds pipelines and storage	Engineering enables stats but is not analysis
T7	Root cause analysis	Investigates causes of incidents	Descriptive stats only surfaces symptoms
T8	Monitoring	Continuous checks for service health	Monitoring uses summaries but includes alerting rules
T9	Business intelligence	Dashboards for business decisions	BI often mixes descriptive and inferred metrics
T10	Time series analysis	Focuses on temporal dependencies	Descriptive summary may ignore time structure

---

Why does descriptive statistics matter?

Business impact (revenue, trust, risk)

• Revenue: Understand conversion rates, average order values, and churn summaries to spot revenue risks.
• Trust: Surface data quality issues early; users trust metrics that are consistent and explainable.
• Risk: Detect abnormal spikes in fraud or latency before large-scale damage.

Engineering impact (incident reduction, velocity)

• Reduce incidents by detecting trends and regressions early.
• Increase velocity by providing reliable summaries for feature rollouts and A/B checks.
• Decrease mean time to detect by highlighting deviations from historical baselines.

SRE framing (SLIs/SLOs/error budgets/toil/on-call)

• SLIs use descriptive stats to define error rate, latency percentiles, and availability.
• SLOs set targets for those SLIs using historical descriptive summaries.
• Error budgets calculated from aggregated incident-free time or error counts.
• Descriptive stats reduce toil by automating baseline reports and anomaly detection.

3–5 realistic “what breaks in production” examples

1. Latency percentiles spike after a deploy causing front-end timeouts; median unchanged while p95 jumps.
2. A memory leak gradually shifts mean memory usage upward, triggering OOMs at night.
3. Request size distribution broadens after a client change, increasing backend CPU and causing cascading failures.
4. Error counts for an auth endpoint suddenly double; descriptive breakdown reveals one client ID as the driver.
5. Billing shows unexpected cost increase; descriptive stats reveal more small high-frequency operations.

---

Where is descriptive statistics used? (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Layer/Area	How descriptive statistics appears	Typical telemetry	Common tools
L1	Edge network	Summaries of request latencies and error rates	latency p50 p95 error count	Observability systems
L2	Service/API	Aggregate response times and status code distributions	response time percentiles status codes	APM, tracing
L3	Application	User action counts and session durations	event counts session length	Analytics and logging
L4	Data layer	Query latency and throughput summaries	query time IO ops	DB monitoring tools
L5	Infrastructure	CPU memory disk usage summaries	CPU avg memory p95 disk io	Cloud monitoring
L6	Kubernetes	Pod restart counts and resource percentiles	restarts CPU usage pod counts	K8s metrics tools
L7	Serverless	Invocation distributions and cold start rates	invocation latency concurrency	Serverless monitoring
L8	CI/CD	Build durations and test flakiness summaries	build time failed builds	CI dashboards
L9	Security	Event frequency and anomaly counts	auth failures suspicious events	SIEM and logs
L10	Observability	Aggregated ingest rate and retention summaries	metric volume log size	Observability platforms

Row Details (only if needed)

• None

---

When should you use descriptive statistics?

When it’s necessary

• To summarize system health for operational dashboards.
• To set SLIs and SLOs using historical baselines.
• For incident triage to quickly quantify impact.
• To validate data quality and pipeline health.

When it’s optional

• When exploratory analysis aims to build hypotheses rather than summarize.
• During early prototyping where single-case studies suffice.
• For very small datasets where raw inspection is feasible.

When NOT to use / overuse it

• Don’t use descriptive stats alone to claim causation.
• Avoid relying on mean alone for skewed distributions.
• Don’t ignore time structure when temporal patterns matter (seasonality, trends).

Decision checklist

• If you need a quick operational picture and have production telemetry -> use descriptive statistics.
• If you need to evaluate long-term causal impact of a change -> combine with experimentation or causal methods.
• If data is heavily skewed or contains outliers -> prefer median and percentiles over mean and variance.

Maturity ladder

• Beginner: Compute counts, mean/median, simple histograms and time series.
• Intermediate: Use percentiles, box plots, grouped summaries, and sliding windows in streaming.
• Advanced: Integrate descriptive summaries into SLO calculations, anomaly detection, automated runbooks, and cost-aware dashboards.

---

How does descriptive statistics work?

Components and workflow

1. Ingestion: Collect events, metrics, and logs from sources (apps, infra).
2. Normalization: Cleanse, dedupe, and add schema/enrichment tags.
3. Aggregation: Compute summaries over windows and groups (mean, median, percentiles).
4. Storage: Persist aggregates in TSDB or OLAP for historical queries.
5. Visualization/Alerting: Dashboards and alerts consume aggregates.
6. Action: Engineers investigate and remediate based on findings.

Data flow and lifecycle

• Raw telemetry -> collector -> preprocessing -> streaming/batch aggregator -> store -> dashboards/alerts -> incident response -> feedback to instrumentation.

Edge cases and failure modes

• High-cardinality tags can explode aggregation cost.
• Late-arriving or out-of-order events bias summaries.
• Sampling can distort percentiles.
• Metrics gaps during outages misrepresent health.

Typical architecture patterns for descriptive statistics

• Centralized TSDB pattern: All metrics aggregate to a single time-series database for query and dashboarding. Use when you need unified querying and retention control.
• Sidecar streaming pattern: Lightweight collectors compute aggregates per service and emit summaries to reduce cardinality and cost. Use for cost-sensitive high-cardinality environments.
• Lambda/OLAP pipeline: Raw events flow to an event store and periodic batch jobs compute descriptive statistics for historical analytics. Use for complex cohort analysis.
• Edge aggregation pattern: Aggregates computed at edge or CDN to reduce cross-region bandwidth. Use when minimizing cross-datacenter traffic matters.
• Serverless aggregation pattern: Use event-driven functions to compute summaries on demand for dynamic workloads. Use when workload is spiky and you want pay-per-use cost.

Failure modes & mitigation (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Failure mode	Symptom	Likely cause	Mitigation	Observability signal
F1	Skewed mean	Mean diverges from median	Outliers or heavy tail	Use median and percentiles	Median vs mean gap
F2	Missing windows	Gaps in dashboards	Ingestion backlog or outage	Add buffering and backfill	Drop rate alerts
F3	High-cardinality cost	Storage and query slow	Too many tag combinations	Pre-aggregate or limit tags	Query latency increase
F4	Late events bias	Sudden historic shifts	Out-of-order ingestion	Windowing with allowed lateness	Watermark lag metric
F5	Sampling distortion	Percentiles inaccurate	Aggressive sampling	Adjust sampling or compute exact for key metrics	Sampling ratio metric
F6	Metric churn	Dashboards flapping	Name or tag schema changes	Enforce metric schema versioning	New metric rate
F7	Aggregation errors	Wrong numbers on dashboards	Bug in aggregation code	Add unit tests and golden datasets	Data validation alerts
F8	Storage retention loss	Historical summaries unavailable	Incorrect retention policy	Fix retention and backfill	Retention miss alerts

Row Details (only if needed)

• None

---

Key Concepts, Keywords & Terminology for descriptive statistics

Below is a compact glossary of 40+ terms with short definitions, why they matter, and common pitfalls.

1. Mean — Arithmetic average of values — Quick central measure — Sensitive to outliers
2. Median — Middle value in sorted data — Robust center for skewed data — Not stable for small samples
3. Mode — Most frequent value — Useful for categorical data — Can be multi-modal
4. Variance — Average squared deviation from mean — Measures spread — Hard to interpret units squared
5. Standard deviation — Square root of variance — Intuitive dispersion — Misleading for non-normal data
6. Percentile — Value below which a percentage falls — Captures tail behavior — Different definitions of interpolation
7. Quartile — 25% increments of sorted data — Useful for box plots — Sensitive to sample size
8. Interquartile range — Q3 minus Q1 — Robust spread measure — Ignores distribution tails
9. Histogram — Binned frequency distribution — Visualizes shape — Bin choice affects story
10. Box plot — Visual summary of distribution — Shows median and IQR — Outlier definition varies
11. Skewness — Asymmetry of distribution — Identifies tail dominance — Sample skew noisy
12. Kurtosis — Tail heaviness measure — Spots heavy tails — Hard to interpret for non-statisticians
13. Frequency table — Counts by category — Simple breakdown — High-cardinality harms readability
14. Time window — Period for aggregation — Controls sensitivity — Too short increases noise
15. Rolling average — Moving mean over window — Smooths noise — Can hide transient spikes
16. Exponential smoothing — Weighted recent data more — Quick adaptation — Parameters matter
17. P50/P90/P95/P99 — Common percentiles for latency — Show user experience — Require accurate aggregation
18. Outlier — Extreme value outside expected range — Signals bugs or attacks — May be legitimate change
19. Sampling — Selecting subset of data — Reduces cost — Can bias results if not uniform
20. Aggregation key — Grouping field for summaries — Enables drilldowns — Too many keys cause cardinality issues
21. Cardinality — Number of unique values in a dimension — Drives cost — High cardinality slows queries
22. Tagging — Labels on metrics/events — Enables context — Inconsistent tags break joins
23. Watermark — Progress marker for streaming data — Controls lateness handling — Poor watermark leads to bias
24. Sliding window — Overlapping aggregation windows — Smooths trends — Computationally costlier
25. Tumbling window — Non-overlapping window — Simpler semantics — May miss transient changes at boundaries
26. Backfill — Recompute historical aggregates — Fixes gaps — Costly for large data
27. Drift — Gradual change in metric baseline — Early warning for issues — Hard to detect without long history
28. Baseline — Expected normal range derived from history — Basis for anomaly detection — Seasonality can mislead baseline
29. Seasonality — Regular cyclic patterns — Explains repeating variation — Requires proper windowing
30. Anomaly detection — Flagging deviations from baseline — Automates alerts — False positives if baseline poor
31. Data quality check — Tests on schema and values — Prevents garbage-in — Needs to run continuously
32. SLI — Service level indicator — Customer-facing metric — Requires careful instrumentation
33. SLO — Service level objective — Target for SLI — Too aggressive SLOs cause pager fatigue
34. Error budget — Allowable failure over time — Drives release decisions — Miscounting errors skews budget
35. Burn rate — Speed of consuming error budget — Helps paging decisions — Sensitive to window choice
36. Observability — Ability to infer system state — Relies on descriptive summaries — Incomplete telemetry reduces visibility
37. TSDB — Time series database — Stores time-indexed aggregates — Retention settings trade cost vs access
38. OLAP — Analytical query store — Good for large aggregates — Not ideal for high-cardinality real-time data
39. Cardinality explosion — Rapid growth of unique tag combinations — Causes cost and performance issues — Sanitize tags early
40. Drift detection — Automation to find baseline shifts — Reduces manual monitoring — Can be noisy if misconfigured
41. Latency distribution — Full distribution of response times — Shows user experience — Median alone conceals tails
42. Confidence interval — Range that likely contains a parameter — Used in inference not descriptive summaries — Misapplied when data non-random
43. Correlation coefficient — Measures linear relationship — Not implying causation — Confused with causality
44. Cohort analysis — Grouping by signup or event time — Reveals behavioral patterns — Requires consistent cohort definition

---

How to Measure descriptive statistics (Metrics, SLIs, SLOs) (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Metric/SLI	What it tells you	How to measure	Starting target	Gotchas
M1	Request latency p95	Tail user experience	Compute 95th percentile over 5m windows	p95 < 300ms	Sampling can undercount tails
M2	Request success rate	Availability and correctness	Success count divided by total per 1m	> 99.9%	Counts depend on good success definition
M3	CPU usage p90	Infrastructure stress	CPU usage percentiles per pod	p90 < 80%	Short spikes may be missed with long windows
M4	Error rate by endpoint	Localize failing functions	Errors/requests by endpoint per 1m	Baseline dependent	High-cardinality endpoints
M5	Event ingestion lag	Pipeline freshness	Time difference between event time and processing	< 1s for real-time	Clock skew and late arrival
M6	Metric drop rate	Data completeness	Expected vs received metric points	< 0.1%	Naming changes create false drops
M7	Session duration median	User engagement	Median session time hourly	Baseline dependent	Bots can skew session counts
M8	Cost per 1M requests	Cost efficiency	Cloud spend divided by request volume	Varies by app	Costs vary by region and tier
M9	Pod restart rate	Stability	Restarts per pod per day	< 0.1 restarts/day	OOMs and probes can cause flapping
M10	Data quality failure rate	Pipeline integrity	Failed checks over total checks	< 0.5%	False positives from brittle checks

Row Details (only if needed)

• None

Best tools to measure descriptive statistics

Tool — Prometheus

• What it measures for descriptive statistics: Time-series metrics, counters, histograms, summaries.
• Best-fit environment: Kubernetes and microservices monitoring.
• Setup outline:
• Instrument services with client libraries.
• Export metrics via /metrics endpoint.
• Configure scraping targets and scrape intervals.
• Use recording rules for heavy aggregates.
• Retain data using remote write to long-term storage.
• Strengths:
• Efficient for high-cardinality numeric metrics.
• Strong ecosystem with alertmanager and exporters.
• Limitations:
• Percentile approximation complexity in Prometheus histograms.
• Not ideal for high-cardinality label explosion.

Tool — OpenTelemetry + Collector

• What it measures for descriptive statistics: Unified telemetry including traces, metrics, and logs.
• Best-fit environment: Cloud-native observability and distributed tracing.
• Setup outline:
• Instrument code with OpenTelemetry SDKs.
• Deploy collectors for batching and export.
• Configure exporters to chosen backend.
• Strengths:
• Standardized instrumentation across languages.
• Flexible pipeline and enrichment.
• Limitations:
• Collector configuration complexity.
• Backend performance depends on chosen storage.

Tool — Grafana

• What it measures for descriptive statistics: Visualization and dashboards for aggregates.
• Best-fit environment: Multi-backend dashboards and alerting.
• Setup outline:
• Connect to TSDBs and logging backends.
• Build panels for percentiles and histograms.
• Configure alerts and notification channels.
• Strengths:
• Powerful visualization and templating.
• Supports many data sources.
• Limitations:
• Query cost depends on backend.
• Dashboard maintenance burden at scale.

Tool — BigQuery (or cloud OLAP)

• What it measures for descriptive statistics: Batch aggregated analytics on large event stores.
• Best-fit environment: Analytical queries over large historical datasets.
• Setup outline:
• Export events to cloud storage or streaming ingestion.
• Run scheduled SQL jobs to compute aggregates.
• Materialize views for dashboards.
• Strengths:
• Scales to petabytes for historical analysis.
• Complex aggregation capabilities.
• Limitations:
• Cost for frequent queries.
• Not real-time for high-frequency needs.

Tool — Datadog

• What it measures for descriptive statistics: Metrics, traces, logs, and synthetic checks.
• Best-fit environment: Cloud SaaS observability and APM.
• Setup outline:
• Install agents or use SDKs.
• Configure monitors and dashboards.
• Use tags for grouping and aggregation.
• Strengths:
• Integrated platform with low setup friction.
• Good for mixed cloud environments.
• Limitations:
• Commercial cost at scale.
• Tag cardinality can become expensive.

Recommended dashboards & alerts for descriptive statistics

Executive dashboard

• Panels: Business KPIs, overall request success rate, p95 latency, cost per request, user engagement median.
• Why: High-level health and trends for leadership and product owners.

On-call dashboard

• Panels: SLI real-time charts (p50/p95/p99), error rate by service, recent deploys, rollout status, top offending endpoints.
• Why: Rapid triage and root cause identification for on-call responders.

Debug dashboard

• Panels: Request distribution histograms, trace samples for p95, per-instance CPU/memory, logs filtered to recent error traces, cohort comparisons.
• Why: Deep dive for engineers during incidents.

Alerting guidance

• Page vs ticket: Page for SLO burn rate crossing critical thresholds or sharp increases in p99 latency; ticket for non-urgent regressions or degradation in non-customer-facing metrics.
• Burn-rate guidance: Page when burn rate > 14x and projected to exhaust error budget within 1 day; warn at 2x and 4x for escalations.
• Noise reduction tactics: Use grouping by service and endpoint, dedupe alerts within short windows, suppress alerts during known maintenance, and add dynamic thresholds based on baseline variance.

---

Implementation Guide (Step-by-step)

1) Prerequisites – Inventory telemetry sources and owners. – Define key SLIs and business objectives. – Choose storage and compute for metrics.

2) Instrumentation plan – Standardize metric names and tags. – Instrument latency, success, and resource metrics in code. – Add contextual tags such as region, version, and customer tier.

3) Data collection – Deploy collectors (Prometheus/OpenTelemetry). – Configure sampling and aggregation rules. – Ensure consistent clocks and timezones.

4) SLO design – Use historical descriptive summaries to propose SLO targets. – Define measurement windows and error budget policies.

5) Dashboards – Build executive, on-call, and debug dashboards. – Add weekly trend panels and cohort comparisons.

6) Alerts & routing – Create monitors tied to SLO states and burn rates. – Route critical pages to on-call and informational alerts to channel.

7) Runbooks & automation – Document runbooks for common alerts with step-by-step remediation. – Automate common fixes (scale up, restart, circuit-breaker).

8) Validation (load/chaos/game days) – Run load tests and chaos experiments to validate metrics and alerts. – Exercise runbooks during game days.

9) Continuous improvement – Review alert noise, SLOs, and dashboards monthly. – Iterate instrumentation based on incident postmortems.

Pre-production checklist

• Instrumentation tests pass.
• Aggregation rules verified with golden dataset.
• Dashboards show expected baseline.
• Synthetic tests in place.

Production readiness checklist

• Alert routing tested and known on-call rotation.
• Backfill and retention policy validated.
• Cost projection for metrics and storage approved.

Incident checklist specific to descriptive statistics

• Validate metric freshness and ingestion.
• Confirm metric naming and tags unchanged.
• Check for sampling and retention anomalies.
• Recompute aggregates with raw events if needed.

---

Use Cases of descriptive statistics

1. SLO monitoring for API latency – Context: Public REST API. – Problem: Users report slow responses intermittently. – Why it helps: p95 and p99 reveal tail latency beyond median. – What to measure: p50/p95/p99 latency, error rate by endpoint. – Typical tools: Prometheus, Grafana, tracing.

2. Cost anomaly detection – Context: Cloud bill spikes unexpectedly. – Problem: Unknown increased spend. – Why it helps: Cost per request and request distribution reveal drivers. – What to measure: Cost per 1M requests, resource p90, API calls by client. – Typical tools: Cloud billing export, BigQuery, dashboards.

3. Data pipeline freshness – Context: Analytics platform delayed ingestion. – Problem: Reports stale by hours. – Why it helps: Ingestion lag aggregates identify delay windows. – What to measure: Event lag p95, backlog size, checkpoint age. – Typical tools: OpenTelemetry, BigQuery, Dataflow metrics.

4. CI flakiness reduction – Context: Builds failing intermittently. – Problem: CI instability blocks deploys. – Why it helps: Aggregating build duration and failure frequency spots flaky tests. – What to measure: Build time median, test failure rate, flaky test counts. – Typical tools: CI dashboards, test reporting tools.

5. Security monitoring for auth failures – Context: Rise in login failures. – Problem: Potential brute-force attack. – Why it helps: Distribution of auth failures by IP and user reveals patterns. – What to measure: Failed auth counts, unique IP counts, rate per minute. – Typical tools: SIEM, logs aggregation.

6. Capacity planning – Context: Plan for seasonal traffic growth. – Problem: Under-provision risk during peak. – Why it helps: Historical usage percentiles guide resource sizing. – What to measure: Request p95, CPU p90, concurrent users p95. – Typical tools: TSDB, cloud monitoring.

7. Feature rollout monitoring – Context: Gradual feature release. – Problem: Unknown impact on latency and errors. – Why it helps: Compare cohorts and compute differences in medians and percentiles. – What to measure: SLI per variant, error delta, user engagement. – Typical tools: A/B tooling plus analytics.

8. Storage performance monitoring – Context: Database latency increases. – Problem: Slow queries degrade app. – Why it helps: Query latency distributions and tail metrics identify hotspot queries. – What to measure: Query p95, slow query counts, IO wait p90. – Typical tools: DB monitoring, APM.

9. Business funnel analysis – Context: Drop-off in checkout funnel. – Problem: Unknown step causing conversion loss. – Why it helps: Counts and conversion rates by step identify the bottleneck. – What to measure: Step conversion rates, median time per step. – Typical tools: Analytics events, BigQuery.

10. ML feature validation – Context: Feature drift over time. – Problem: Model performance degrading. – Why it helps: Descriptive stats of features detect distribution shifts. – What to measure: Feature mean/std dev, missing value rates, value ranges. – Typical tools: Feature store and data monitoring tools.

---

Scenario Examples (Realistic, End-to-End)

Scenario #1 — Kubernetes latency spike after deploy

Context: Microservices running in Kubernetes with Prometheus and Grafana.
Goal: Detect and roll back changes when tail latency increases after CI deploys.
Why descriptive statistics matters here: p95 and p99 latencies show user impact while median may hide issues.
Architecture / workflow: Instrument services with OpenTelemetry exporting metrics to Prometheus; Grafana dashboards with SLO panels; CI triggers recording rules.
Step-by-step implementation:

• Instrument latency histograms and status codes.
• Configure Prometheus recording rules for p50/p95/p99.
• Add Grafana on-call dashboard with p99 and error rate by deploy tag.
• Create alert: p99 > 500ms for 5m triggers page.
• Automate canary rollback in CI if alert fires within deployment window. What to measure: p50/p95/p99 latency, error rate, pod restart rate.
  Tools to use and why: Prometheus for metrics, Grafana for dashboards, CI pipeline for automated rollback.
  Common pitfalls: Not tagging metrics with deploy version; sampling hides extremes.
  Validation: Run canary traffic while measuring p95 and ensure rollback triggers correctly.
  Outcome: Faster detection and automated rollback reduced incident duration.

Scenario #2 — Serverless cold start impacting tail latency

Context: Serverless functions (managed PaaS) with spikes in p95 latency during scale-ups.
Goal: Identify cold-start contribution to tail latency and adjust concurrency settings.
Why descriptive statistics matters here: Distribution of cold-start vs warm invocation latencies explains user experience.
Architecture / workflow: Functions emit histogram of invocation latency and a cold-start tag; metrics collected into cloud monitoring and BigQuery for deeper analysis.
Step-by-step implementation:

• Instrument function to add cold_start boolean tag.
• Aggregate p50/p95 for cold_start true vs false.
• Dashboard shows split and percent of invocations cold.
• Alert when cold-start invocations exceed 1% and p95 > threshold.
• Tune provisioned concurrency or adopt warmers. What to measure: Percentage cold-start, cold-start p95, overall p95.
  Tools to use and why: Cloud provider monitoring for quick metrics and BigQuery for historical trend analysis.
  Common pitfalls: Mislabeling warm/cold events, cost of provisioned concurrency.
  Validation: Synthetic traffic to simulate scaling and confirm metrics reflect cold starts.
  Outcome: Reduced tail latency by provisioning concurrency for critical functions.

Scenario #3 — Incident response postmortem for DB latency regression

Context: Production incident where database query p95 doubled causing user-facing errors.
Goal: Triage, contain, and prevent recurrence.
Why descriptive statistics matters here: Historical percentiles and drift detection show gradual increase vs sudden spike.
Architecture / workflow: DB emits query latencies, APM traces correlate slow queries to service versions.
Step-by-step implementation:

• Triage using p95 latency by service and query signature.
• Roll back recent deploy or apply targeted index if identified.
• Postmortem: compute daily p95 over past 30 days to determine drift.
• Implement alert for gradual p90 increase using monthly baseline. What to measure: Query p95 history, slow query counts, SLI error budget impact.
  Tools to use and why: APM for traces, DB monitoring for query stats, BigQuery for postmortem analysis.
  Common pitfalls: Missing query signatures due to sampling; incomplete historical retention.
  Validation: Re-run slow queries on staging with production-like data.
  Outcome: Root cause identified (inefficient query), index added, and an alert for query regression created.

Scenario #4 — Cost vs performance trade-off for autoscaling

Context: Service autoscaling aggressively and costs rising while tail latency remains acceptable.
Goal: Optimize autoscaling policy for cost without harming user experience.
Why descriptive statistics matters here: Cost per request and latency percentiles together inform cost-performance trade-offs.
Architecture / workflow: Metrics for cost, latency, request rate fed to dashboard; autoscaler configuration uses CPU or custom metric.
Step-by-step implementation:

• Compute cost per 1M requests and latency p95 at current scale.
• Test reducing min replicas while monitoring p95 and p99.
• Use descriptive stats to set autoscaler thresholds to tolerate brief latency increases but save cost.
• Implement scheduled scale policies for predictable traffic patterns. What to measure: Cost per requests, p95/p99 latency, request concurrency.
  Tools to use and why: Cloud billing export, Prometheus, Grafana.
  Common pitfalls: Ignoring tail latency in favor of median, delayed cost visibility.
  Validation: Run controlled traffic with reduced min replicas and observe p95 limits.
  Outcome: Reduced costs with acceptable latency using tuned autoscaling policies.

---

Common Mistakes, Anti-patterns, and Troubleshooting

List of mistakes with symptom -> root cause -> fix (selected highlights; includes observability pitfalls)

1. Symptom: Alerts flood on deploy. -> Root cause: SLO thresholds too tight and no deployment suppression. -> Fix: Add deployment window suppression and adjust thresholds.
2. Symptom: Median stable but p95 spikes. -> Root cause: Tail issues from a subset of nodes. -> Fix: Drill down by host and replace unhealthy nodes.
3. Symptom: Dashboards show gaps. -> Root cause: Collector outage or retention misconfig. -> Fix: Add buffering and validate retention settings.
4. Symptom: Percentiles inconsistent across tools. -> Root cause: Different aggregation methods or sampling. -> Fix: Standardize histogram buckets and sample rates.
5. Symptom: High metric cost. -> Root cause: Cardinality explosion from uncontrolled tags. -> Fix: Sanitize and limit tags; pre-aggregate.
6. Symptom: False positive anomalies. -> Root cause: Baseline not accounting for seasonality. -> Fix: Use time-of-day baselines and rolling windows.
7. Symptom: SLI counts mismatch business reports. -> Root cause: Different success criteria or out-of-sync timezones. -> Fix: Standardize SLI definitions and time handling.
8. Symptom: Slow queries for summary reporting. -> Root cause: Running heavy OLAP queries on production storage. -> Fix: Materialize aggregates in a separate analytics store.
9. Symptom: Incorrect p95 due to sampling. -> Root cause: Downsampling of high-volume events. -> Fix: Compute exact percentiles for key SLIs or increase sampling fidelity.
10. Symptom: Unreadable histograms. -> Root cause: Poor bin choices. -> Fix: Re-bin with log scale for latency distributions.
11. Symptom: Over-alerting during holidays. -> Root cause: Baseline trained on non-holiday data. -> Fix: Add calendar-aware baselines.
12. Symptom: Missing traces for high latency. -> Root cause: Tracing sampling drops slow traces. -> Fix: Increase tracing sampling for p95 trace collection.
13. Symptom: Wrong aggregates after schema change. -> Root cause: Metric name changes without backward compatibility. -> Fix: Implement metric versioning and migrations.
14. Symptom: Delayed incident detection. -> Root cause: Long aggregation windows hide spikes. -> Fix: Use multi-resolution windows; short windows for detection and long for trends.
15. Symptom: On-call fatigue. -> Root cause: Excess low-value alerts tied to descriptive stats. -> Fix: Refine alert thresholds and create suppression rules.
16. Symptom: Misleading averages in dashboards. -> Root cause: Mixing medians and means without context. -> Fix: Label measures clearly and prefer percentiles.
17. Symptom: Pipeline backfill expensive. -> Root cause: Full recompute due to missing partitions. -> Fix: Use incremental backfill and checkpointing.
18. Symptom: Broken SLO calculation after data gap. -> Root cause: Missing ingestion during outage. -> Fix: Document and backfill gaps; pause error budget if appropriate.
19. Symptom: Analysts disagree on metric meaning. -> Root cause: Lack of metric catalog and definitions. -> Fix: Maintain catalog with owners and definitions.
20. Symptom: Observability blind spot in new region. -> Root cause: Collector not deployed or misconfigured regionally. -> Fix: Deploy collectors per region and validate.
21. Symptom: Dashboard slow to load. -> Root cause: Heavy cross-join queries on high-cardinality tags. -> Fix: Add precomputed panels and limit query scope.
22. Symptom: Alert suppressed incorrectly. -> Root cause: Overzealous dedupe rules. -> Fix: Revisit grouping and dedupe settings.
23. Symptom: Security event counts spike without context. -> Root cause: Lack of enrichment tags for source. -> Fix: Enrich logs with user and app context.
24. Symptom: Confidence lost in metrics. -> Root cause: Frequent metric breaking changes without communication. -> Fix: Version metrics and announce changes.

Observability pitfalls included above: sampling hide p95, tracing sampling config, cardinality explosion, missing collectors, and incorrect aggregation windows.

---

Best Practices & Operating Model

Ownership and on-call

• Assign clear owners for SLIs and metric namespaces.
• On-call rotations include a metrics owner for observability issues.
• Define escalation paths for metric integrity problems.

Runbooks vs playbooks

• Runbooks: Step-by-step remediation for specific alerts and metric failures.
• Playbooks: Higher-level decision guides for incidents, including rollback criteria.

Safe deployments (canary/rollback)

• Always test SLI changes in canary before full rollout.
• Automate rollback criteria tied to SLO burn rates or key SLI spikes.

Toil reduction and automation

• Automate routine summaries and runbook steps.
• Use automated backfills and schema validation to avoid manual fixes.

Security basics

• Protect metric ingestion with authentication and rate limits.
• Restrict who can modify recording rules and alerting thresholds.
• Mask PII in telemetry and enforce log redaction.

Weekly/monthly routines

• Weekly: Review alert noise and SLO burn-rate trends.
• Monthly: Review metric taxonomy and retention costs.
• Quarterly: Audit owners, validate baselines, run load tests.

What to review in postmortems related to descriptive statistics

• Were key metrics available and accurate during incident?
• Did alerts fire correctly and route appropriately?
• Were dashboards and runbooks adequate for triage?
• Was there any metric-induced delay or confusion?
• Action items: instrumentation gaps, retention changes, SLO adjustments.

---

Tooling & Integration Map for descriptive statistics (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Category	What it does	Key integrations	Notes
I1	TSDB	Time-series storage for metrics	Prometheus Grafana remote write	Use for real-time metrics
I2	Tracing	Distributed traces for latency breakdown	OpenTelemetry Jaeger	Useful for p95 root cause
I3	Logging	Event storage and search	ELK Splunk	Correlate logs with aggregates
I4	OLAP	Batch analytics and historical aggregates	BigQuery Redshift	Use for long-term cohorts
I5	APM	Application performance monitoring	Vendor SDKs Tracing	Combines metrics and traces
I6	Alerting	Notification and routing	PagerDuty Slack	Route pages and tickets
I7	Collector	Telemetry aggregation and enrichment	OpenTelemetry Prometheus	Centralize collection
I8	Cost analytics	Cost attribution and trends	Cloud billing export	Link cost to metrics
I9	CI/CD	Deployment and rollback automation	GitHub Actions CI tools	Integrate SLO checks in pipeline
I10	SIEM	Security events correlation	Log sources Identity	Use for security telemetry

Row Details (only if needed)

• None

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

H3: What is the difference between mean and median?

Mean is the arithmetic average; median is the middle value. Use median when distributions are skewed.

H3: Can descriptive statistics prove causation?

No. Descriptive statistics summarize observed data but do not establish causal relationships.

H3: Are percentiles affected by sampling?

Yes. Aggressive sampling can distort percentile estimates, especially in tails.

H3: How often should SLIs be measured?

Depends on the service; common choices are 1m or 5m windows for realtime SLOs and larger windows for trend analysis.

H3: How do I choose histogram buckets for latency?

Use logarithmic buckets for latency spanning orders of magnitude; align with user experience thresholds.

H3: What is a good starting SLO for latency?

Varies by product. Use historical p95 baseline to set a realistic starting target, then tighten as confidence grows.

H3: How to handle high-cardinality tags?

Limit tags to necessary keys, pre-aggregate, and enforce naming conventions to prevent explosion.

H3: Should I compute percentiles client-side or server-side?

Server-side aggregation in a TSDB or histogram is preferred for consistent percentiles.

H3: How do I detect drift in metrics?

Use rolling baselines and drift-detection algorithms that compare recent summary stats to historical windows.

H3: What storage retention should I use for aggregates?

Balance cost and needs: short-term high-resolution (30–90 days), long-term lower-resolution (1–3 years) for trends.

H3: How to avoid alert noise?

Tune thresholds based on historical variance, use grouping and dedupe, and apply maintenance windows.

H3: Can descriptive stats be computed in serverless environments?

Yes. Serverless can compute aggregates but consider cold starts and aggregation cost.

H3: How to validate aggregated metrics?

Compare aggregates to golden datasets and run sanity checks during deployments.

H3: How to handle late-arriving events?

Use allowed lateness windows, watermarking, and backfill processes to correct aggregates.

H3: Do I need separate dashboards for execs and engineers?

Yes. Exec dashboards show high-level KPIs; on-call dashboards show raw SLIs and traces.

H3: How to measure data quality with descriptive stats?

Track missing rates, range checks, and schema conformance as SLIs for pipelines.

H3: What is a safe burn-rate threshold to page?

A common policy: page when burn rate > 14x and projected exhaustion in 24 hours; warn at lower multipliers.

H3: How to report descriptive statistics to non-technical stakeholders?

Use clear visuals (percentiles, trendlines), provide plain-language summaries, and avoid statistical jargon.

H3: How often should I review SLOs?

Monthly for operational review and quarterly for business alignment.

---

Conclusion

Descriptive statistics is the operational backbone for observability, incident response, cost optimization, and data quality. It provides compact, actionable summaries of telemetry that empower engineering and business decisions without overclaiming causality.

Next 7 days plan

• Day 1: Inventory metrics and owners; define 3 critical SLIs.
• Day 2: Ensure instrumentation for SLIs is present and standardized.
• Day 3: Create on-call and executive dashboards for those SLIs.
• Day 4: Implement recording rules and short-window alerts for detection.
• Day 5: Run a short game day to validate dashboards and runbooks.

---

Appendix — descriptive statistics Keyword Cluster (SEO)

• Primary keywords
• descriptive statistics
• descriptive statistics definition
• descriptive statistics examples
• descriptive statistics in cloud monitoring
• descriptive statistics SLI SLO
• latency percentiles descriptive statistics
• descriptive statistics dashboard
• descriptive statistics tutorial
• descriptive statistics for engineers
• descriptive statistics for SREs

• descriptive statistics in observability

• Related terminology

• mean and median
• p95 p99 explained
• histogram vs box plot
• time series descriptive statistics
• percentiles in monitoring
• central tendency measures
• dispersion measures variance standard deviation
• interquartile range use cases
• outlier detection summary
• metric cardinality management
• OpenTelemetry descriptive metrics
• Prometheus histograms percentiles
• designing SLIs with descriptive stats
• building SLOs from historical data
• error budget burn rate
• alerting on percentile increases
• dashboard best practices SRE
• observability telemetry summarization
• serverless cold start analysis
• Kubernetes p95 latency monitoring
• time window aggregation strategies
• sliding vs tumbling windows
• sampling effects on percentiles
• aggregation keys and cardinality
• metric naming conventions
• metric schema versioning
• backfill strategies for metrics
• anomaly detection based on summaries
• cohort analysis descriptive statistics
• cost per request metrics
• data quality checks using descriptive stats
• confidence intervals vs summary stats
• skewness kurtosis explained
• seasonality-aware baselining
• histogram bucket design
• telemetry enrichment practices
• metric retention strategies
• OLAP for historical summary stats
• tracing vs metrics tradeoffs
• runbooks for metric incidents
• chaos testing observability
• telemetry security best practices
• metric catalog and governance
• dashboard alert noise reduction
• metric drop rate detection
• percentile computation methods
• golden dataset validation
• descriptive stats for A/B testing
• ML feature distribution monitoring
• descriptive statistics for fraud detection
• cost-performance tradeoffs monitoring
• SLO creation checklist
• service health summary metrics
• engineering telemetry maturity
• descriptive statistics for product analytics
• automated rollbacks using SLOs
• descriptive stats in CI/CD pipelines
• descriptive statistics in incident postmortem
• observability platform comparisons
• best tools for descriptive statistics
• dashboards for exec and on-call
• descriptive statistics glossary